//Case studies//

What we found, what we fixed, what it meant for the business.

Full write-ups from authorized assessments — what unbreachable found, what we recommended, and the outcome.

PicX Studio

How PicX Studio found hidden security risks in four days

What we found

Within four days, Unbreachable documented a prioritized set of findings, each rated by the effect it could have on customers and on the business.

What we recommended
  • Findings ordered by urgency and business consequence
  • Standard hygiene alongside the fixes: credential rotation and monitoring
The outcome

PicX Studio received a complete view of its most important external security risks in one assessment.

Read the full case study →
Breadsync

How Breadsync uncovered risks around its most sensitive operations

What we found

The assessment documented a prioritized set of findings and showed how individually minor gaps could combine into a larger business risk.

What we recommended
  • A plan separating urgent work from longer-term hardening
  • Verification of the affected areas once changes were deployed
The outcome

Breadsync received more than a list of isolated security warnings.

Read the full case study →
JarvX

How JarvX strengthened protection across its platform

What we found

The assessment documented a prioritized set of findings, each rated by its realistic effect on customer privacy and on the business.

What we recommended
  • A prioritized plan ordered by realistic business consequence
  • A retest of the affected journeys once changes were deployed
The outcome

JarvX received evidence-backed clarity on where its real risk sat, and a clear order in which to address it.

Read the full case study →
Nick Launches

How Nick Launches strengthened its security before scaling

What we found

The assessment documented twenty security findings across four severity levels, each rated by realistic business consequence.

What we recommended
  • A five-phase roadmap starting with the highest-consequence exposure
  • A verification retest of every critical and high-priority item
The outcome

The immediate value of the engagement was visibility.

Read the full case study →
ScanTrader

How ScanTrader strengthened its platform security before scaling

What we found

The assessment confirmed a number of controls were already effective and documented a small set of prioritized findings, each rated by its potential effect on customers and the business.

What we recommended
  • A remediation plan ordered by business impact rather than technical severity
  • Defined closure criteria and a verification retest for every prioritized item
The outcome

ScanTrader received a clear view of where its security already held up and a short, ordered list of what to strengthen first.

Read the full case study →
MediaFast

How MediaFast found privacy and integration risks before they became an incident

What we found

A number of controls were already effective, and the assessment documented two priority findings rated by their realistic effect on users and the business.

What we recommended
  • A remediation plan ordered by business impact, not technical severity
  • A verification retest of the affected journeys after deployment
The outcome

MediaFast received a clear view of which controls were already doing their job and which areas created genuine customer or business risk.

Read the full case study →